What to know : Arbitrum's Security Council has frozen 30,766 ETH, worth about $71 million, linked to the $292 million rsETH exploit against Kelp DAO, placing the funds in a governance-controlled wallet. The emergency action, taken with input from law enforcement and without affecting other Arbitrum users or applications, prevents the original exploiter from accessing the seized funds. The freeze recovers roughly a quarter of the stolen assets and intensifies the dispute between Kelp and bridge provider LayerZero over responsibility for the hack and how remaining losses should be shared.
A chunk of the Kelp DAO haul is no longer going anywhere.
Arbitrum's Security Council froze 30,766 ETH worth roughly $71 million on Monday night, moving funds linked to Saturday's $292 million rsETH exploit into an intermediary wallet that can only be accessed through further Arbitrum governance action.
The council said it acted on input from law enforcement regarding the exploiter's identity and executed the freeze "without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications."
The transfer completed at 11:26 p.m. ET on April 20, according to Arbitrum's statement on X. The stolen funds are no longer controllable by the address that originally held them.
The move recovers about a quarter of the total amount drained from Kelp's LayerZero-powered bridge on Saturday, when attackers pulled 116,500 rsETH by exploiting compromised verifier infrastructure. LayerZero attributed the attack with preliminary confidence to North Korea's Lazarus Group.
Arbitrum is a layer-2 blockchain, meaning a network built on top of Ethereum that processes transactions more cheaply and settles them back to the main chain. Its Security Council is a group of elected signers with emergency powers to take protective action in exactly this kind of scenario, though governance-level interventions on user funds remain rare and controversial because they introduce a degree of discretionary control over an otherwise permissionless network.
The freeze leaves Kelp with a partial recovery option on top of whatever else law enforcement and chain-tracing firms can claw back.
It also escalates the ongoing dispute between Kelp and LayerZero over who bears responsibility for the exploit, since any broader socialization of remaining losses now has a $71 million offset to work with before legal coordination, insurance, or treasury contributions come into play.
Kelp has said it is coordinating with ecosystem partners on a recovery fund and weighing next steps on unpausing, loss socialization, and legal coordination with affected counterparties. LayerZero has not publicly commented on the Arbitrum freeze.
Whether more stolen funds can be frozen depends on where else the attacker moved rsETH or its derivatives before consolidation, and whether other chains with similar emergency powers choose to act on their portions of the flow.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
