On the evening of April 24, 2026, an aggressive on-chain operation turned the spotlight back to Hyperliquid: Lookonchain was quoted by panews, revealing that a newly created wallet address 0x0b8a sold 75 ETH for approximately 174,000 USD, and then immediately went long on about 9.19 million APE on Hyperliquid with 5x leverage, corresponding to a nominal position of about 1.03 million USD. This means that this address magnified a medium-sized spot ETH position into a high-leverage one-way bet of over one million USD in a short time, opting for a long position on APE.

This "switching funds from ETH to APE" is not an isolated incident. On April 24, 2026, glassnode reported through multiple media outlets that over the past two months, the positions of whales on Hyperliquid have been steadily increasing, and these large perpetual trading accounts were described as "continuously waiting for the price to break out of the current range," with a strong overall bullish sentiment. The evening news from Planet Daily also reiterated this view, providing corroboration for the accumulation of long positions by whales on Hyperliquid, while the high-leverage long position of the new wallet 0x0b8a coincides with this bullish atmosphere, possibly reflecting that some funds are betting on subsequent volatility with higher leverage.

However, at the same time that bullish sentiment is warming up, there are starkly opposing whale positions on Hyperliquid. According to reports from Onchain Lens and panews on April 23, 2026, whale address @0x58bro deposited 2,791 ETH to Binance in the past 24 hours and a total of 3,811 ETH (approximately 9.03 million USD) over the past month, leaving only 0.5 ETH on-chain; meanwhile, this address still holds 25x leverage shorts on ETH and 40x leverage shorts on BTC on Hyperliquid. Jinse Finance noted that its total profit on Hyperliquid is about 33 million USD. One is a newly entered wallet that is betting on APE with a 5x long position, and the other is an established whale that has continuously profited from high-leverage ETH and BTC shorts and transferred funds to centralized exchanges. The long and short positions have formed a highly opposing pattern on the same platform, and which side's position is correct still needs the market to provide the answer.

New Wallet's Big Bet on APE After Selling ETH

From the on-chain path, the actions of address 0x0b8a are highly concentrated and tightly paced: Lookonchain and panews reported that this newly created wallet sold 75 ETH at around 21:54 on April 24, 2026, realizing approximately 174,000 USD, and then directly used these funds to open a position on Hyperliquid, going long about 9.19 million APE with 5x leverage, corresponding to a nominal value of about 1.03 million USD. The funding path can be summarized as follows: selling ETH to obtain USD-denominated funds, injecting it as margin into the derivatives account, and then magnifying it into several times the nominal exposure on a single asset, with almost no sign of diversification or hedging.

The reports did not disclose address 0x0b8a's previous on-chain behavior records, confirming only that it is a newly emerged large leveraged participant. In the absence of historical performance and style portrait, directly taking on the combination of "selling ETH—high-leverage long on APE" with a new address reflects a strong risk appetite: firstly, proactively switching from relatively mainstream and deeper liquidity assets to more volatile ones; secondly, using a large amount of leverage to bet on a single direction for APE, indicating a clear and aggressive bullish expectation for future price trends, with relatively limited capacity to withstand medium-term pullbacks. Such positions could face drastic fluctuations in profit and loss in a short time.

From the perspective of market environment fitting, this high-leverage long position on APE did not occur during a period of emotional vacuum. On the same day, glassnode stated through multiple media that the positions of whales on Hyperliquid have steadily increased over the past two months, waiting for a price breakthrough from the current range; in the afternoon of April 24, several media outlets gathered to relay this viewpoint, and around 21:54 in the evening, the heavy long position of 0x0b8a entered the market, forming a connection with the overall bullish sentiment on the platform in terms of the timeline. It is still difficult to confirm whether this address belongs to the same type of "bullish whales" camp or is just an isolated gamble of a single fund, but from the trading structure, it appears to be an aggressive incremental chip that emerged under the existing bullish atmosphere. Whether it is representative still needs to be validated by more similar new addresses entering the market.

Whale Bulls Accumulate Positions Over Two Months, Betting on Breakthroughs

From the time dimension, glassnode provided key signals on April 24, 2026, through Odaily, TechFlow, Foresight, and other channels, which is a "slow variable" that has been running for two months: the whale bullish positions on Hyperliquid have been continuously and steadily increasing over the past two months. Although the reports did not disclose the specific types of assets and did not provide an exact price range, the description of "overall increase in long positions" essentially outlines the main direction of large perpetual contract traders on the platform—continuing to add to long positions without seeing a clear upward trend, rather than chasing prices at high levels.

Glassnode summarized the logic of this portion of funds as "expectation for prices to break through a certain range." Since the specific range was not disclosed, we cannot confirm whether it is targeting a single asset or a basket of contracts, but this characterization reveals at least two points: firstly, whales view the current price as part of a mid-term fluctuation range, rather than the end of a trend; secondly, they prefer to pay the time and capital costs for an upward volatility expansion, rather than frequently switching directions. On that day, multiple media outlets emphasized this viewpoint with highly similar wording around 16:45–17:00, and in the evening at 19:29, Odaily's evening news again emphasized that "Hyperliquid whales continue to increase long positions," amplifying this "breakthrough expectation" at the discourse level, becoming one of the main narratives for interpreting Hyperliquid's bullish sentiment that day.

In contrast to this “structural bullish with slow accumulation,” around 21:54 that day, the newly created address 0x0b8a sold 75 ETH, realizing approximately 174,000 USD, and then went long approximately 9.19 million APE with 5x leverage on Hyperliquid, with a nominal value of about 1.03 million USD. This type of high leverage and concentrated entry behavior appears more like a tactical gamble emerging in the existing bullish atmosphere. The differences between the two are not only reflected in the time scale—the former is a two-month steady accumulation, while the latter is an aggressive entry completed within a few dozen minutes—but also in risk tolerance and position intention: whale bulls may emphasize repeatedly laying out positions within the range, diluting costs, while the new wallet tends to use higher leverage for a direct bet on a single breakthrough outcome.

This also explains why, although both are "going long," their structural implications are different:
● For the whales tracked by glassnode, the long positions have steadily risen for two consecutive months, closer to a mid-term bet on the overall market direction for the upcoming time, without the short-term rally being the only consideration.
● For new addresses like 0x0b8a's high-leverage long, it is still difficult to determine if their capital size and trading style are sufficient to be classified within the "whale camp," but from the degree of position concentration and leverage multiplier, it is more likely a magnified response to the day's narrative of "the range about to be broken," rather than the initiator of this narrative itself.

From the structural relationship perspective, the continuous accumulation of whale bulls over two months forms the "foundation" of long positions on Hyperliquid, while new wallets like 0x0b8a's high-leverage longs may serve as marginal buyers and emotion amplifiers: as expectations for range breakthroughs are repeatedly reinforced by the media, such funds are more easily attracted to enter the market, increasing the short-term volatility amplitude. Whether they will become the “dumping party” for early-positioned whales still needs observation of more similar addresses’ subsequent movements, but at least it can be confirmed that there is a structural layering of long-standing accumulating whale bulls and short-term aggressive bulls coexisting within Hyperliquid, laying the groundwork for subsequent differentiation and potential dramatic volatility.

Whale Shorts Realize ETH Yet Maintain Short Positions

In contrast to the path taken by bullish whales accumulating positions, the whale address @0x58bro has acted more like "withdrawing chips" over the past month. According to monitoring by Onchain Lens and panews, as of noon on April 23, 2026, this address had deposited 2,791 ETH into Binance in the past 24 hours, equivalent to about 6.64 million USD at the time's price; accumulating a total deposit of 3,811 ETH over the past month, approximately 9.03 million USD. Meanwhile, this address has only about 0.5 ETH remaining on-chain, nearly equivalent to transferring all ETH spot positions to the exchange, which is generally interpreted as "possibly preparing to realize on-chain."

It is notable that this whale, which has nearly emptied its on-chain ETH, did not choose to "step back but maintains strong directional exposure at the derivatives level. The same report shows that they still hold 25x leverage shorts on ETH and 40x leverage shorts on BTC on Hyperliquid. Jinse Finance's statistics claim that their total profit on Hyperliquid is about 33 million USD, indicating that as of the current observation point, this high-leverage short strategy has yielded considerable phase profits.

From the path perspective, @0x58bro transfers thousands of ETH to Binance, reducing on-chain spot duration exposure while insisting on maintaining high-leverage short positions on Hyperliquid. This combination of "spot selling pressure + derivatives shorting" might be aimed at locking in some profits and releasing on-chain asset constraints while allowing already profitable shorts to continue seeking larger trends. It could also be that the ETH transferred to Binance serves as backup margin or risk cushion to address the drastic fluctuations of high-leverage shorts during market rebounds, though this specific intention still awaits subsequent funding flows to corroborate.

In contrast, glassnode pointed out that Hyperliquid whale bulls have steadily increased long positions over the past two months, betting on price range breakthroughs; on April 24, 2026, Lookonchain reported that the new wallet 0x0b8a sold 75 ETH for approximately 174,000 USD, and then went long approximately 9.19 million APE with 5x leverage on Hyperliquid, with a nominal position of about 1.03 million USD. This bullish path contrasts sharply with @0x58bro’s "clearing spot + adding leverage short": the former increases risk exposure, while the latter continues to bet down after realizing ETH liquidity.

On the same platform, the long whale accumulating over the long term, the influx of short-term aggressive bulls, and funds like @0x58bro firmly holding onto short positions create a highly differentiated directional structure on Hyperliquid. For the market, this differentiation may both buffer unilateral trends and signify that once the current range is broken, be it upward or downward, it could amplify volatility intensity in the concentrated balance of long and short whales.

Fee Comparisons of On-Chain and Contract Activity

From the dimension of "activity," the Ethereum main chain and the Hyperliquid contract platform presented an interesting contrast on April 24, 2026. Odaily Planet Daily cited Artemis data at 16:02 that the Ethereum network's fee income over the past 24 hours was 2.7 million USD, exceeding Hyperliquid's 1.7 million USD during the same period; this set of numbers forms an intuitive snapshot of short-term activity intensity between the main chain and the contract platform.

Fee income is usually correlated with trading activity: under the premise of a relatively stable fee structure, higher fees often indicate higher trading frequency and larger capital throughput. From this 24-hour data, Ethereum still bears a higher intensity of on-chain settlement and interaction demands, with the main chain's usage heat still dominant. However, in the context of Ethereum's total fee still being higher, Hyperliquid's 1.7 million USD daily fee "chased closely" indicates that its derivatives business also accommodated substantial trading demand during this period.

Combining this fee snapshot with the funding behavior surrounding Hyperliquid on the same day clarifies its meaning:
On one hand, glassnode was reported by several media outlets between 16:45 and 17:00 that over the past two months, whale long positions on Hyperliquid have been steadily increasing, showing strong bullish sentiment among large perpetual contract traders; on the other hand, around 21:54 that day, the newly created wallet address 0x0b8a was reported by Lookonchain and panews to have sold 75 ETH for approximately 174,000 USD and then went long about 9.19 million APE with 5x leverage, corresponding to a nominal value of approximately 1.03 million USD. This means that on a day where Ethereum's main chain overall saw higher fees and denser on-chain activity, whales increasing long positions and aggressive new high-leverage funds chose to make directional bets on Hyperliquid, clearly skewing the focus of this long-short competition toward the derivatives platform.

This reflects a noteworthy structural phenomenon: higher main chain fees mean that the foundational layer remains the main stage for capital inflows, asset issuance, and protocol interactions; yet when it comes to bearing price risks, amplifying leverage, and betting on future trends, some large funds may prefer to concentrate their efforts on contract platforms like Hyperliquid. Here, fee income plays the role of a "thermometer"—the 2.7 million USD from Ethereum and 1.7 million USD from Hyperliquid correspond to different heat dimensions of settlement and derivatives layers.

It is important to emphasize that using fee comparisons at a single time point to determine "whether funds are migrating" has clear limitations. Firstly, this data only covers a 24-hour window, and the reports do not provide a comparison trajectory over a longer cycle, making it impossible to confirm trend changes based on this; secondly, different platforms may have variations in fee structures, user compositions, and trade scales, and, it remains unclear how much actual trading nominal amount corresponds to the 1.7 million USD fee; thirdly, while the bullish accumulation around Hyperliquid and the new wallet's high-leverage behavior undoubtedly increased the market's focus on this platform, whether this focus is driven by short-term sentiment or a long-term structural shift still requires more data to verify.

Therefore, the comparison of fee income between Ethereum and Hyperliquid provides an important reference for observing on-chain and contract layer activity levels，但不足以单独支撑“资金全面转向合约平台”之类的结论. A more cautious approach is to combine these fee snapshots with changes in whale positions, on-chain address behaviors, and longer-term data to depict the true track of funds' rhythmic flow between settlement and derivatives layers.

What Signals to Watch After the Upgrade of Long-Short Showdown

In light of the currently observable three representational behaviors: first, the newly created address 0x0b8a sold 75 ETH for approximately 174,000 USD at around 21:54 on April 24, 2026, and then went long about 9.19 million APE with 5x leverage, corresponding to a nominal value of approximately 1.03 million USD; second, glassnode was repeatedly cited by media on April 24, stating that Hyperliquid whales have been continuously increasing long positions over the past two months, showing strong bullish sentiment among large perpetual contract traders; third, short whales such as @0x58bro were reported on April 23 to still hold high-leverage ETH shorts (25x) and BTC shorts (40x) on Hyperliquid, and it is reported that they have achieved total profits of about 33 million USD and are still maintaining a short position—continuous accumulation of long positions by bulls, substantial accumulated profits by bears without liquidation, combined with new wallets' high-leverage APE bets, jointly shape the current core picture of long-short differentiation on Hyperliquid.

Under this framework, the market needs to closely monitor a few key evolutionary paths:
● Firstly, the profit and loss trajectory of the large long positions in APE, including 0x0b8a. Current information only shows that it has carved out a nominal long position of about one million USD with 5x leverage; whether these positions will continue to accumulate, be passively reduced, or proactively take profits or stop-loss during the floating profit/loss phase will directly impact the bullish fund's risk tolerance limit for APE.
● Secondly, whether the Hyperliquid whale bulls pointed out by glassnode will continue the "steady accumulation" rhythm of the past two months. If future monitoring shows that this class of large bullish positions continues to expand, it can be taken as an indication that bullish sentiment is still accumulating; conversely, a slowdown in the growth rate of bulls or even a turn towards reducing positions or hedging would imply that the current degree of bullish overcrowding may have approached the risk threshold for these funds, with marginal sentiment changes warranting attention.
● Thirdly, whether the short whales, especially @0x58bro, will show signs of reducing shorts, moving funds, or layering in hedge structures. It is reported that its realized and floating profits are approximately 33 million USD; whether this cushion will be continued to “lay down and win” or be used for profit locking and reducing leverage still relies on subsequent on-chain and position dynamics for confirmation, which will also determine the space for the shorts in the next round of volatility.

At the same time, these signals need to be interpreted against a broader liquidity and activity backdrop. Odaily Planet Daily cited Artemis data at 16:02 on April 24, 2026, showing that the Ethereum network's fee income over the past 24 hours was 2.7 million USD, higher than Hyperliquid's 1.7 million USD; this indicates that the overall activity level of the main chain's settlement layer is still greater than that of a single contract platform during this time period. In other words, even if the differentiation of long and short on Hyperliquid and the whale competitions have been particularly noticeable in a short time, it is still insufficient to support judgments such as “fund structures have decisively shifted to a certain platform.”

A more prudent approach is to combine the above Hyperliquid whale long-short data, 0x0b8a's high-leverage APE behavior, with Ethereum's main chain fees, positions and trading from other venues, as well as longer-term position rotation rhythms, to view them as reference samples for understanding changes in fund structures, rather than offering unidirectional definitive conclusions. The current brief does not provide more detailed on-chain data for Aster or other platforms; further evaluations about whether this long-short showdown will evolve into cross-platform or cross-asset capital migrations still require new on-chain evidence and price performance to fill in this puzzle.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。