Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Hyperliquid HYPE Large Warehouse Turnaround: The Cost of Extreme Long Positions

CN
链上雷达
Follow
3 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

On the Hyperliquid platform, a game of leverage and resilience is becoming the focus of on-chain data. According to multiple media outlets citing on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, the address holding the largest position of HYPE on Hyperliquid has successfully turned losses into profits after experiencing a thrilling "extreme rebalancing." This major holder began to heavily long HYPE since the end of October 2025, establishing a massive long position of approximately 1.38 million HYPE at an average price of about $38.675, with the current nominal position valued at around $56.82 million.

This position was not built without challenges. In January 2026, when the price of HYPE plunged to around $20, the unrealized loss of this address expanded to about $23.18 million. To avoid forced liquidation of the position, the major player repeatedly deposited margin into their Hyperliquid account during this period and accumulated payment of up to approximately $2.107 million in single-coin funding fees over several months of holding. With the recent price rebound, the position has now turned into an unrealized profit of about $3.42 million, becoming the most representative extreme long case on the platform.

Meanwhile, Hyperliquid is gradually becoming a central stage for high-leverage trading and extreme market stories. Recently, the APE token surged over 110% in a short period, during which a controversial incident occurred involving suspected insider traders profiting about $2.27 million through a long-short dual strategy, and new addresses placing large bets with 5x leverage. CoinGlass data further confirms the volatility intensity of the platform: as of April 24, 2026, within a 24-hour period, the largest single liquidation across the network appeared in Hyperliquid's BTC-USD trading pair, amounting to about $3.5809 million. Against the backdrop of a total liquidation of about $171 million across the network, the capital game on Hyperliquid is showcasing unprecedented cruelty and tension.

From -$23.18 million to +$3.42 million: HYPE Major Position's Turnaround

In the high-volatility game on Hyperliquid, the profit and loss curve of the address holding the largest HYPE position has become a footnote to extreme risk preference. Data tracking shows that this address began to heavily long HYPE at the end of October 2025, with an average opening price anchored around $38.675. With a position size of about 1.38 million HYPE, its nominal value once reached $56.82 million, making it the most iconic long position on the platform.

However, the path to building this massive position was not smooth. In January 2026, as the price of HYPE retracted to around the $20 mark, this address faced severe survival challenges. Various materials confirm that during the price's deep decline, the address's unrealized loss once expanded to $23.18 million. During this extreme retracement phase, the whale chose not to cut losses but instead forced a position through multiple margin deposits into the Hyperliquid account, reflecting extreme bullish bets on the medium-to-long-term trend of HYPE's price and a very high risk tolerance boundary.

As HYPE's price gradually rebounded, this position ultimately reversed from a huge loss to an unrealized profit in late April 2026. As of now, the position is showing an unrealized profit of about $3.42 million. Although a "turnaround" has been achieved, the profit margin of $3.42 million relative to the previous extreme unrealized loss of $23.18 million results in a profit-loss ratio of only 1:6.7, highlighting the extreme path dependence of high-leverage longs under severe volatility: without sufficient margin support, positions of this size are prone to collapse due to liquidity exhaustion before price recovery.

Supplementing Margin to Maintain Position: A High-Stakes Gamble on the Edge of Liquidation

On-chain data indicates that this HYPE major holder's path to profitability was not smooth but rather a series of extreme maneuvers jumping back and forth on the edge of liquidation. In January 2026, when the HYPE price plunged near $20, the risk of this address's position peaked. According to multiple media, such as Jinse Finance and Odaily Planet Daily, citing on-chain analysis, this address chose not to cut losses during deep unrealized losses but instead managed to pull the position back from the liquidation line by repeatedly depositing margin into their Hyperliquid account.

This ongoing margin supplementation behavior in a high-leverage environment reflects the significant psychological pressure and strategic rigidity faced by top whales during extreme volatility. Although community channels speculate about the specific leverage multiples and exact liquidation prices of this position, the maintenance of approximately 1.38 million HYPE (nominally worth about $56.82 million) indicates that any delay in margin supplementation could lead to tens of millions of dollars in assets instantly becoming worthless. This "gamble of exchanging time for space" not only requires traders to have strong capital reserves but also necessitates an almost obsessive judgment of the underlying asset's trends.

In addition to the direct threat of price volatility, the hidden costs of long-term holding are also staggering. Since this address has maintained a large long position since establishing its stake at the end of October 2025, the cumulative funding fees paid for the HYPE single asset have reached approximately $2.107 million. This means that even though the current price rebound has resulted in an unrealized profit of about $3.42 million, a substantial portion of this is eroded by high holding costs. For high-leverage traders, this expense of over $2 million in "interest" is a hard cost that must be paid to maintain a massive position, further compressing their final net profit margin.

APE Surge Night: Dual Arbitrage Earns $2.27 million

While the HYPE whale held their position, another precise hunt targeting APE on Hyperliquid showcased explosive arbitrage potential within a very short period. According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, during the intense fluctuation when APE surged over approximately 110%, a specific address displayed a controversial long-short dual strategy. This address initially deposited about 75 ETH (approximately $174,000) as initial margin and then established both long and short positions for APE on Hyperliquid.

This complex contract strategy was not a simple hedge, but a precisely coordinated harvesting operation in conjunction with on-chain liquidity. During APE's price spike, this address profited through Hyperliquid and withdrew approximately 1,027 ETH (about $2.37 million) while also purchasing around 26 additional ETH on-chain. Through this series of operations, the address acquired a total of approximately 1,053 ETH, and after deducting initial costs, ultimately profited about 978 ETH, translating to a profit of around $2.27 million at that time's prices.

This case has sparked widespread discussion on social media due to its high capital efficiency and nearly perfect timing. Multiple media outlets have described it as a "suspected insider trading," with the core question being how this address precisely leveraged a very low margin ($174,000) to shake out multiple times its principal profit just before APE's spike. This suspected high-leverage arbitrage behavior, which seems to utilize information asymmetry, not only prompts the market to reexamine the complex trading paths on Hyperliquid but also brings the trading fairness of decentralized derivatives platforms during extreme markets back to the forefront of public discourse.

New Wallet Sells 75 ETH, All-In Long on APE

Amid the intense volatility of APE, Hyperliquid attracted not only complex arbitrageurs but also became a battleground for high-risk speculators. Lookonchain monitoring shows that a newly created wallet address 0x0b8a took an extremely aggressive trading path: this address first sold 75 ETH on Hyperliquid, cashing out approximately $174,000; subsequently, instead of holding the funds, they quickly converted this money into margin and opened a long contract with about 5x leverage.

Data records the scale of this "all-in" bet: 0x0b8a ultimately established a long position of approximately 9.19 million APE, with a nominal value of up to $1.03 million. This behavior of selling spot to acquire liquidity before magnifying risk exposure through derivatives tools reflects the typical "high-leverage betting" characteristic of newly entered accounts. Although reports did not disclose the subsequent closing timing or specific profits and losses of this address, its initial position-building action clearly outlines its intention to exploit leveraged tools for excess returns amidst APE's fluctuations.

Contrasting this case with the aforementioned suspected insider trader's long-short dual arbitrage strategy reveals the strategic differentiation displayed by Hyperliquid participants in response to the same asset volatility. Unlike the former, who locked in profits through long-short hedging and complex on-chain asset transfers, the operation of 0x0b8a is closer to a unilateral market gamble. Although its capital scale is inferior to that of the whales, this "full-position" entry method further highlights the characteristics of this platform as a preferred battleground for high-risk preference funds in extreme volatility environments.

Dual Explosions and Major Position Turnaround

From the deep squat jump of the HYPE whale to the complex game during APE's volatility, Hyperliquid is becoming the epicenter of extreme leverage and large positions contending against each other. The profit and loss curve of the address holding the largest HYPE position is highly representative: since establishing the position at an average price of $38.675 at the end of October 2025, this address faced a massive unrealized loss of approximately $23.18 million when the price fell to around $20 in January 2026. Through multiple margin supplements and paying up to $2.107 million in funding fees, this address ultimately achieved an unrealized profit of about $3.42 million after the price rebounded. This deep capital resistance to volatility "long-term unilateral bets" starkly contrasts with earning $2.27 million through the "short-term event-driven" strategy in APE trading, revealing the sharp differentiation in risk exposure and return curves on this platform.

Network data further confirms the brutality of Hyperliquid's high-leverage environment. CoinGlass data shows that on April 24, 2026, within a 24-hour period, the total liquidation across the network was about $171 million, while the largest single liquidation came from Hyperliquid's BTC-USD trading pair, amounting to as much as $3.5809 million. Under the imbalanced pattern of long liquidations totaling $101 million and short liquidations totaling approximately $70.4366 million, Hyperliquid's significant liquidation events highlight its presence as a battleground for high-risk preference funds.

Looking ahead, the market needs to closely observe the dynamic evolution of these massive positions:
● After achieving a "turnaround," will the HYPE whale choose to continue holding for higher profits or begin to reduce positions under the pressure of high funding fees?
● Will the suspected insider layout appearing in APE trading and the high-leverage unilateral bet by the address 0x0b8a inspire more followers to imitate this highly controversial strategy?
● In the absence of systemic trading volume and open interest data support, will Hyperliquid's frequency in network liquidation events continue to rise, becoming a key variable in measuring on-chain derivatives liquidity risk?

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin's Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by 链上雷达

13 hours ago
34.61 million shares return: ASTER major shareholder unusual activity
1 day ago
2.27 million winning orders on Hyperliquid: Is it insider information?
1 day ago
Hyperliquid Storm: APE Profits and Whale Bullishness
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatar智者解密
9 minutes ago
Scallop SUI pool 150,000 SUI stolen
avatar
avatar82584957
44 minutes ago
Warm Heart Talk on Coins: Tonight's Bitcoin/Ethereum Analysis
avatar
avatar财经达人周悦盈
6 hours ago
Yueying: 4.26 Bitcoin Ethereum Today's Market Analysis Bullish Return Strong Reversal? Attached Latest Trend Strategy
avatar
avatar智者解密
6 hours ago
Ethereum Foundation unstakes 48.9 million: selling pressure or false alarm?
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink