On May 3, 2026, the geopolitical situation in the Middle East released complex game signals in a very short time window. According to reports from multiple media outlets including Tasnim News Agency, Iran provided a formal response consisting of 14 points to the 9-point proposal previously put forward by the United States. The core disagreement between the two sides lies in the timetable and the ultimate goal: the U.S. prefers to implement a two-month ceasefire plan, while Iran insists on resolving all issues within 30 days and achieving a "final peace" rather than just a temporary ceasefire. Although U.S. President Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the proposal earlier, Iran's marginal concessions regarding the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and discussions on nuclear issues still injected expectations of eased geopolitical risks into the market, and this macro narrative game is profoundly affecting the pricing logic of risk assets.

In response to the tug-of-war of macro circumstances, the on-chain ecology and fund flows demonstrated strong resilience and defensive characteristics during the same period. On May 3, the Arbitrum Committee voted to urgently unfreeze approximately $71 million worth of Ethereum to curb the approximately $290 million loss faced by Kelp DAO due to vulnerabilities, reflecting the intervention capability of the L2 governance layer in DeFi security events. At the same time, there was no significant contraction in the risk asset allocation on the surface data. According to AICoin data, on May 2, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a total net inflow of approximately $630 million, with BlackRock's IBIT experiencing a single-day net inflow of about $284 million; Ethereum spot ETFs also recorded a net inflow of approximately $101 million, with Fidelity's FETH leading the inflow at $49.39 million. The intertwining of eased macro geopolitical expectations and rapid handling of on-chain security risks makes the current market appear more like a search for balance amid multiple signals rather than a decisive shift in a single direction.

Iran's 14-point Response: From Two-Month Ceasefire to 30-Day Final Peace

On May 3, 2026, the game concerning the Middle Eastern situation entered a critical stage of conditional exchanges. According to reports from Tasnim News Agency, Iran provided a formal response consisting of 14 points to the 9-point proposal previously put forward by the United States. The core disagreement of this response lies in the timetable and strategic endpoint: the United States favors first implementing a two-month ceasefire plan to gain breathing space, while Iran insists on resolving all core issues within 30 days, shifting the negotiation focus from "extending the ceasefire" to a complete "final peace." In its specific 14-point demands, Iran clearly stated the need for guarantees against military aggression, required the United States to withdraw surrounding military forces, and end maritime blockades. Furthermore, the unfreezing of blocked assets, payment of war reparations, comprehensive lifting of sanctions, and ending combat on multiple fronts, including Lebanon, were included in its core agenda.

This tough stance also exhibits some strategic compromise aimed at alleviating the heavy costs of war on its economy. According to the Wall Street Journal, citing informed sources on May 2, Iran showed a more flexible attitude towards key issues such as the management of the Strait of Hormuz and port blockades in its newly submitted proposal. Iran proposed establishing a new Strait mechanism and concurrently discussing this issue within the same timeframe as the U.S. commitment to stop attacks and lift the blockade on Iranian ports. This "bundled" shift effectively attempts to use nuclear program discussions and Strait management rights as leverage to exchange for U.S. substantial relief from sanctions, thereby creating a path for the resumption of talks.

However, despite Iran showing a willingness to expedite the final peace, the U.S. response remains cautious. On May 2, 2026, U.S. President Trump publicly expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal through the media, indicating that there remains a significant gap in bargaining on core interests between the two sides. From the perspective of market data logic, the frequency of proposal releases reflects an accelerated pace of gameplay rather than an immediate resolution of geopolitical risk. Although the cryptocurrency market performed robustly with solid net inflows into ETFs on the previous trading day, due to the U.S. retaining opinions on existing conditions, the final adjustment of the Middle Eastern risk premium will still require time for verification, and the market continues to observe whether the radical timetable of "30-day final peace" has a realistic basis for implementation.

Cryptocurrency ETF Data Under Middle Eastern Easing Expectations

While the situation in the Middle East released signals for a "final peace proposal," the cryptocurrency market did not see capital withdrawal due to potential adjustments in risk aversion. According to AiCoin data, on May 2, 2026, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a significant net inflow of about $630 million, with BlackRock's IBIT taking the lead with a single-day inflow of $284 million. Meanwhile, Ethereum spot ETFs also maintained a solid accumulation stance, with a net inflow of approximately $101 million throughout the day, and Fidelity's FETH contributed about $49.39 million to the inflow share. Although Bitcoin ETFs clearly outperformed in attracting funds compared to Ethereum, the dual positive reception of the two major asset ETFs reflects that institutional investors, in facing the accelerated changes of geopolitical gaming, have not shifted their allocation intentions towards defensive reduction but rather prefer to maintain risk asset positions ahead of clarifying circumstances.

In addition to the direct ETF fund flows, movements in U.S. cryptocurrency concept stocks and prediction markets further corroborate the complexity of market sentiment. By the end of trading on May 2, U.S. cryptocurrency concept stocks showed overall strength, with specific stock CRCL rising over 9.7%, indicating that the capital market remains optimistic about the underlying logic of the cryptocurrency industry. At the same time, in the decentralized prediction market Polymarket, the predicted probability concerning the "CLARITY Act taking effect in 2026" surged by 21 percentage points within 24 hours, reaching about 67%. This optimistic outlook on U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory prospects resonates subtly with Iran's attempt to exchange sanction relief and revive economic negotiations through its "30-day final peace" proposal, mutually supporting market risk preferences during turbulent periods.

In summary, the current ETF data and market performance appear more like a reflection of "risks present but not yet reduced." Although Iran's new proposal aims to end the war and alleviate domestic economic pressure, and the Wall Street Journal pointed out that there is space for compromise on key issues such as management in the Strait of Hormuz, Trump's reserved attitude towards the proposal still adds uncertainty to the situation. In this intertwining environment of macro geopolitical pressure and domestic regulatory favorable expectations, institutional capital has not blindly withdrawn due to uncertain geopolitical signals; the sustained inflow of ETFs indicates that mainstream capital views cryptocurrency assets as a core window for observing macro fluctuations rather than merely speculative chips.

Arbitrum Unfreezes $71 Million to Rescue Kelp DAO

On May 3, 2026, the outbreak of an on-chain security incident added technical variables to a fluctuating market. According to media sources, the Arbitrum Committee decided through an emergency vote to unfreeze approximately $71 million worth of Ethereum (ETH) assets. The primary goal of this move was to curb the financial crisis faced by the DeFi re-staking protocol Kelp DAO due to exposed vulnerabilities. Preliminary statistics indicate that the potential losses related to Kelp DAO's vulnerabilities are about $290 million, which constitutes a serious protocol-level security incident; if the gap is allowed to widen, it could trigger a chain reaction in liquidity assets within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

This "fire-fighting" action fully demonstrates the intervention capability of the Layer 2 governance layer in extreme risk events. According to AiCoin data, the assets being unblocked were accomplished using the centralized power of the Arbitrum Committee's governance mechanism under specific emergency conditions. Although this mechanism provides critical "lender of last resort" support when the DeFi security firewall collapses, it has also reignited discussions within the cryptocurrency community about the balance between centralized governance and decentralized security safety nets. The Committee's intervention through voting, while physically halting further spread of the risk, raises ongoing concerns regarding the compliance boundaries and transparency of its operations.

Currently, the specific details of how the approximately $71 million in unblocked assets will be used to cover the $290 million loss, as well as the proportion of the funding gap that can ultimately be covered, have not been fully disclosed. Until the specific causes and remediation plans for the Kelp DAO vulnerabilities are clarified, the risk exposure within the Arbitrum ecosystem remains under dynamic observation. The actual execution effects of subsequent unblocked funds and their impact on the credibility of L2 governance will serve as an important reference for measuring the ecosystem’s capability to respond to systemic risks.

Implications of DeFi Security Events on Market Sentiment

According to AiCoin data, the potential losses triggered by the Kelp DAO vulnerabilities are estimated to reach $290 million, a magnitude that possesses extremely high destructiveness within the current on-chain ecosystem. On May 3, 2026, the Arbitrum Committee decided through an emergency vote to unfreeze previously frozen Ethereum assets worth approximately $71 million to prevent further risk spread. This intervention action not only showcases the efficiency of the L2 governance layer in dealing with unexpected security crises but also highlights the reliance on a few subjects' decision-making regarding asset unblocking permissions, emphasizing the trade-offs seen within some on-chain systems between decentralization aspirations and extreme risk management. Despite mainstream assets being continuously allocated through channels like ETFs, the Kelp DAO incident clearly reminds the market that contract vulnerabilities and governance risks remain core variables that cannot be ignored within the on-chain ecosystem.

This dynamic of real-time on-chain governance contrasts sharply with the disclosure rhythm of traditional financial regulations. On May 1, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a plan allowing publicly traded companies to reduce their financial statement disclosure frequency from once quarterly to once semi-annually, which has been reviewed by the White House. Since 1970, publicly traded companies in the U.S. have adhered to a quarterly disclosure system; once this reform is implemented, it will significantly lengthen the information disclosure cycle of traditional markets. In contrast, DeFi protocols have a natural transparency advantage regarding asset flow and status changes, yet still exhibit shortcomings in audit rigor, governance security, and emergency plans. This difference between "high-frequency transparency but high risk" and "low-frequency disclosure but strong regulation" is becoming a key dimension for investors to measure risk premiums.

Against the backdrop of sustained net inflows into spot ETFs, security events at the protocol level may be reshaping the asset allocation pathways for participants. According to AiCoin monitoring, on May 2, 2026, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a total net inflow of approximately $630 million (of which BlackRock's IBIT accounts for $284 million), with Ethereum spot ETFs also recording a net inflow of about $101 million. In a phase where off-exchange capital is flooding in at scale, security risks like those posed by Kelp DAO may create a "trust diversion" effect: some funds may be more inclined to hold underlying assets through regulated financial products rather than directly entering high-risk on-chain protocols. While this change currently remains a possibility, the frequent occurrence of security vulnerabilities undoubtedly increases the trust cost for on-chain native ecosystems when attracting incremental funds.

Observations After the War Game and On-Chain Firefighting

On May 3, 2026, global markets presented a complex situation of macro geopolitical gaming and dual-line on-chain governance intervention. According to reports from Tasnim News Agency and multiple media outlets, Iran provided a formal response consisting of 14 demands to the previous 9-point proposal from the U.S., with its core demands shifting from simply "ceasefire" to a complete "final peace" within 30 days. This proposal covers key topics such as security guarantees, withdrawal of surrounding U.S. military forces, lifting maritime blockades, unfreezing assets, and establishing a new mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz, and is viewed as an attempt to alleviate the economic costs on Iran and revive negotiations. Even though U.S. leadership has publicly expressed dissatisfaction with this proposal, the tug-of-war regarding the ceasefire period (U.S. proposing 2 months vs. Iran insisting on 30 days) marks the entry of geopolitical conflicts into a critical phase of conditional negotiations. Simultaneously, the on-chain ecosystem is undergoing another "firefighting": on May 3, the Arbitrum Committee voted to urgently unfreeze approximately $71 million worth of Ethereum to address the potential $290 million loss risk posed by Kelp DAO vulnerabilities. This method of governance intervention not only curtails the spread of risk at the DeFi protocol level but also prompts the market to deeply examine the security boundaries and governance powers on-chain.

This situation of coexisting geopolitical easing expectations and native on-chain risks results in the overall market signals exhibiting a high degree of asymmetry. According to AiCoin data, on May 2, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a significant net inflow of approximately $630 million, with BlackRock's IBIT seeing a single-day net inflow of $284 million; Ethereum spot ETFs also recorded a net inflow of approximately $101 million. The continuous accumulation of institutional capital through regulated channels stands in stark contrast to the trust costs exposed by the Kelp DAO event. On Polymarket, the probability of the CLARITY Act taking effect in 2026 has risen to about 67%, combined with regulatory dynamics regarding the SEC's proposed easing of financial statement disclosure frequency, together shaping an environment with warm policy expectations but frequent micro risks. In the short term, the market is unlikely to draw clear bullish or bearish conclusions from a single event; a more reasonable response is to track the evolution of key variables: including whether the U.S. and Iran will initiate a new round of talks, the substantive progress on sanctions issues concerning the Strait of Hormuz, and the subsequent clearance effects of Arbitrum's ecosystem on security events. In the battle over whether the inflow trend of ETFs can continue, these variables will determine whether funds continue flowing into on-chain protocols or further retract into regulated spot products.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
AiCoin On-chain: https://aicoin.com/hyperliquid
AiCoin Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin Exclusive Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。