On May 15, 2026, a large transfer from a wallet associated with Multicoin Capital was captured by on-chain analyst EmberCN: 150,000 AAVE were withdrawn in one go, flowing into custody or trading platforms like Galaxy Digital and BitGo, and then scattered to mainstream exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. At the time, this was estimated to be nearly 14.91 million dollars at a price of about 99 dollars each. Several Chinese crypto media outlets, including TechFlow, Jinse Finance, and PANews, followed up on this on-chain activity on the same day and traced back public data to show that since November 2025, Multicoin had bought approximately 338,000 AAVE at an average entry price of about 219 dollars. With AAVE dropping to around 99 dollars, a decline of about 55%, the media cited estimations that their unrealized losses on this position had exceeded 40.56 million dollars, leading to headlines with phrases like "suspected stop-loss," "suspected sale," and "stop-loss?" However, both EmberCN's on-chain tracking and the media's profit and loss estimation remained at the level of "inferred from the flow of funds"; as of the reporting date, Multicoin had not provided a clear confirmation or denial regarding this transfer, and the on-chain data itself could only prove that these 150,000 AAVE had been pushed onto the exchange's conveyor belt, but could not directly answer whether they had actually been sold on the market. In this information gap, discussions regarding whether institutional risk control had failed and whether DeFi blue chips could withstand selling pressure quickly spread through the market, making this transfer viewed as a magnifying glass for testing institutional position management capabilities.

150,000 AAVE Escaping: On-Chain Financial Roadmap

In EmberCN's tracking screenshot, the "escape" path of these funds is almost clear: on May 15, 2026, a wallet address associated with Multicoin Capital withdrew exactly 150,000 AAVE at once, and then detached from a long-dormant wallet, first being pushed into the address clusters of custody/trading platforms like Galaxy Digital and BitGo. Next, this batch of tokens was segmented and divided into multiple transfers to deposit addresses of mainstream centralized exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Coinbase, forming a continuous link from "suspected self-managed warehouse" to "standard exchange entrance."

To those familiar with on-chain flows, this path is almost a classic "preparing to sell" model: large amounts of tokens are first taken from cold wallets or long-term holding addresses, sent to institutions closer to liquidity hubs like Galaxy Digital and BitGo, and then broken into pieces and spread across multiple exchanges. This indicates that the holder has technically placed their chips in a position to be able to place orders at any time, providing visual evidence for the media's use of phrases like "suspected stop-loss" and "suspected sale." However, even if on-chain data accurately records time, quantity, and direction, what it can prove is that these 150,000 AAVE are already at the doorstep of the exchange; whether these chips have been genuinely sold on the order book still lingers in the conjectures of market participants.

From 219 to 99 dollars: How This AAVE Position Went Into the Red

If we view the May 15 transfer of 150,000 AAVE as the "night before selling," then the story actually had been laid earlier. According to the tracking data from EmberCN and others organized by media, Multicoin purchased approximately 338,000 AAVE in batches around November 2025, with the price lingering at about 219 dollars each, as public reports provided an average entry price of about 219 dollars. In the following six months, as the top lending protocol token, AAVE continued to weaken, dropping to around 99 dollars by mid-May 2026, marking a drop of about 55% from the initial average entry price. This means that even without taking any action, the position on the ledger had already been halved.

As the market began to use calculators to compare this set of numbers, the intuitive sense of "huge losses" was converted into a colder amount. Roughly calculating based on the 338,000 AAVE scale mentioned in reports and the price drop from 219 dollars to 99 dollars, the floating loss falls within the range of over 40 million dollars, with estimates given by media like Jinse Finance exceeding 40.56 million dollars. However, it must be repeatedly emphasized that this number is not the official disclosed settlement result from Multicoin, but a media version derived from public prices and on-chain holding quantities; it can only reflect the book loss range of this position under specific assumptions and is not equivalent to the final profit and loss statement of the involved institution acknowledging a realized loss.

EmberCN's On-Chain Post Ignites Institutional Loss Imagination

On May 15, the story's fuse was actually thin: on-chain analyst EmberCN first posted the transfer path of the 150,000 AAVE on social platforms—from the wallet associated with Multicoin to Galaxy Digital, BitGo, and then dispersed to mainstream exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. Almost without time lag, Chinese crypto media like TechFlow, Jinse Finance, and PANews quickly picked up this on-chain post, translating it into news for the public, using terms like "suspected stop-loss AAVE," "suspected sale," and "stop-loss?" in the headlines, pushing findings that originally belonged to the on-chain analysis circle into a larger public discourse.

The media's caution is reflected in every "suspected." The reports generally emphasized that this is only an inference based on on-chain flows, not transaction records from exchanges; on-chain data can only directly prove the transfer's time, quantity, and direction, but cannot provide a final answer to whether these AAVE have been listed for sale on the exchanges or whether they were executed. More critically, as of that day, there was no public information indicating that Multicoin Capital had released any confirmation or denial statement regarding this transfer. No one was willing to solidify the "possible stop-loss action" into a conclusion of "already acknowledged loss and liquidation" in the absence of a statement from the party involved. It is precisely within this information-incomplete gap that the market began to complete the story on its own: citing the media-provided average entry price of 219 dollars, current price of 99 dollars, and the estimated floating loss exceeding 40.56 million dollars while focusing on the wallet trajectory starting from Multicoin's address and ultimately stopping at the exchange, imagining it as a heavy "institutional stop-loss," which quickly became a new emotional anchor in discussions about DeFi blue-chip liquidity and institutional holding safety.

AAVE Continues to Decline: DeFi Leader Becomes Institutional Pressure Source

For many institutions closely monitoring the market, this "storyline" actually began around November 2025. At that time, AAVE fluctuated around 219 dollars, being viewed as one of the most representative "blue-chip tokens" among top lending protocol tokens, and also a standard configuration for institutions like Multicoin that were heavily invested in the DeFi sector. However, since then, AAVE's price continued to decline, and by mid-May 2026, it had dropped to around 99 dollars, with an approximate decline of 55% on the books. This was not only a drop in a price curve but also a collapse of sector sentiment: as the representative lending protocol token in the industry, AAVE's continued decline was interpreted by many participants as the entire DeFi sector undergoing structural selling pressure, with institutions that held heavier positions and entered earlier feeling the pressure more directly and concretely.

Also because this downward curve had been drawn for more than six months, the on-chain record of the 150,000 AAVE transferred on May 15 from a wallet related to Multicoin was placed in a "stress test" coordinate system by the community. After concentrated reporting from Chinese media, discussions quickly focused on two questions: was this a "concentrated stop-loss by institutions," and under the backdrop of AAVE dropping from 219 dollars to 99 dollars, could DeFi tokens' liquidity withstand such a large repositioning of chips? On-chain data showed that this batch of AAVE first entered custody or trading platforms like Galaxy Digital and BitGo before being dispersed to exchanges like Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. Although this does not directly prove that a sell-off has occurred, it is sufficient for the market to bind this period of AAVE's decline with institutional movements, viewing the price drop of a top lending protocol token as a real test of whether the entire DeFi sector could endure the loosening of institutional chips.

After Huge Losses: Institutional Withdrawal Signal or Risk Repricing

From a book loss exceeding 40 million to a one-time transfer of 150,000 AAVE towards custody and exchanges, this suspected stop-loss laid the institutional dilemma of this cycle out in the open: on one side is pressure from high position entries and continuously declining prices, while on the other side is the risk control paradox of reducing positions potentially missing subsequent rebounds. What can currently be confirmed is only the migration path of funds on-chain—from the wallet associated with Multicoin to Galaxy Digital, BitGo, and then to Binance, OKX, and Coinbase; as for whether these chips have already been absorbed on the market, there is no public information to provide confirmation, and Multicoin itself remained silent around May 15. Thus, the market's interpretation of "suspected stop-loss" more closely aligns with the institutional risk preferences. Regarding this transfer, it could mean a complete acknowledgment of loss and exit, or it could be a repositioning, hedging, or even just a custody arrangement. All versions still linger at the level of conjecture, and what can truly change the narrative will be the institution's subsequent on-chain actions regarding AAVE and other DeFi assets, as well as whether it is willing to provide a clear public statement.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram Community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。