Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Lawyer sues Tether: Who owns 344 million USDT?

CN
红线说书
Follow
10 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

A team led by American lawyer Charles Gerstein recently submitted an application to the Manhattan federal court, requesting the judge to order Tether to handle and transfer approximately 344,149,759 USDT that have been locked on the blockchain—equivalent to about 344 million dollars— for the payment of a batch of terrorism case victims' judgments against Iran that have not been executed. The targeted tokens were originally sitting in two Tron wallet addresses until the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) identified these addresses as related to the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, after which Tether implemented a freeze on them in response to the sanction list, pinning the tokens on-chain and preventing further movement. Now, the plaintiffs seek to further transform this "freeze" into a "transfer": According to CoinDesk, they claim that since Tether can freeze the original tokens, it should reissue an equivalent amount of USDT to a wallet controlled by the plaintiff's lawyers within the technical and compliance framework in order to achieve the actual execution of the Iranian judgment. This request directly pushes the three parties—U.S. sanctions compliance, judicial seizure of digital assets, and the compensation needs of terrorism victims—onto the same rope; it also represents the lawyer team's attempt to extend the pursuit from controlling on-chain assets to the redistribution layer of the issuer's assets after their previous case concerning the seizure of Arbitrum crypto assets. So far, there is no public information indicating that the court has made a final ruling, and Tether has also not issued a formal response; the tug-of-war over "who can use frozen assets and for whom" remains in the exploratory stage of legal tactics and platform boundaries.

From Arbitrum Seizure to Targeting Tether

The same group of lawyers has completed the first round

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by 红线说书

1 hour ago
Payward Layoffs Sprinting Towards IPO: Compliance Landscape Restructuring
2 hours ago
Luo Yonghao defends his rights and names Binance: The compliance storm of celebrity tokens.
13 hours ago
CLARITY Act and Trump's Holdings: Redrawing Cryptocurrency Rules
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatar币圈丽盈
25 seconds ago
币圈丽盈:5.16比特币(BTC)最新行情解读与操作建议
avatar
avatar周彦灵
1 minute ago
Zhou Yanling: May 16 Bitcoin BTC Ethereum ETH Today's Latest Trend Prediction Analysis and Operational Strategy
avatar
avatar链上雷达
14 minutes ago
Iran's Warfire to HYPE's Giant Void: On-Chain High-Stakes Betting Under Macroeconomic Shock
avatar
avatar链上雷达
1 hour ago
THORChain Treasury Hacked: 10.7 Million Dollars in Losses
avatar
avatarHotcoin
1 hour ago
Hotcoin Research | Telegram Takes Over TON: Can a Billion User Entrance Truly Boost the On-chain Ecosystem?
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink